Tsfayo v UK [2011] ECHR 30

European Court of Human Rights

Facts: The case considered whether the original decision-maker must comply with Article 6(1) when the issue turns on a question of fact.

Held: The Court held that when the issue involves a question of fact, the original decision-maker must comply with Article 6(1) requirements. This ensures that the fact-finding process adheres to fair trial standards.

Judicial Statement: The Court reiterated that the procedural guarantees of Article 6(1) apply to the decision-making process, including when factual determinations are involved.