Re Nisbet & Pott’s Contract

Court of Appeal

Basic Facts: Nisbet (N) claimed land acquired through adverse possession. Potts (P) bought land with building restrictions, attempting to rescind the contract due to these restrictions. N argued that the restrictions were extinguished by adverse possession.

Issue for the Court: How do freehold and leasehold covenants interact?

Held The court held that a purchaser with actual notice of an equitable mortgage may be bound by it despite lack of registration.

(Collins MR):

  • Statute of Limitations does not apply to covenants until the right is infringed. A negative easement is enforceable against subsequent purchasers if they had notice. Positive covenants are not enforceable against successors unless they specifically agreed to them.

Previous
Previous

Re Sir Thomas Spencer Wells [1933] Ch 29

Next
Next

Re Ellenborough Park [1955] 3 All ER 667