Peffer v Rigg [1977] 1 WLR 285

Chancery Division

Basic Facts: D transferred property to D2 for nominal consideration, and C claimed breach of trust.

Issue for the Court: When can unregistered interests be gazumped?

Held: The court held that a purchaser with actual notice of an unregistered equitable interest may be bound by it under equitable principles.

Graham J held:

  • D2 took the property subject to Cā€™s unregistered interest due to the nominal consideration.

  • Cā€™s interest remained valid despite the transfer.

Previous
Previous

Phipps v Pears [1965] 1 QB 76

Next
Next

Pascoe v Turner [1979] 1 WLR 431