Binions v Evans [1972] Ch 359
Court: Court of Appeal
Basic Facts: X agreed with D that D could stay in a cottage rent-free as a tenant at will for the rest of her life, provided she maintained the cottage and garden. When X sold the land to C, he notified C of D's rights and reduced the sale price accordingly. C, after purchasing the property, gave notice to D to vacate and attempted to take possession.
Issue for the Court: Was D’s interest in the property enforceable against C, who had notice of D's rights when purchasing the property?
Held: The court found that a constructive trust could arise where a purchaser takes property subject to an existing licensee’s occupation, particularly if the purchaser agrees to be bound by the license.
Lord Denning MR (dismissing the appeal)
Tenancy at Will:
The agreement did not fulfill the criteria for a tenancy at will, despite being named as such.Tenancy for Life:
D was not paying rent, so under section 149(6) of the Law of Property Act (LPA) 1925, this could not be a tenancy for life.
The Settled Land Act 1925 was also inapplicable, as the arrangement didn’t align with D's intent to sell or lease the land.
Contractual License:
This was not a tenancy but a contractual license.
Equity would prevent C from evicting D in breach of the contract.
A purchaser with notice of such an agreement (like C) would be bound by a constructive trust in favor of D.
Constructive Trust:
Where a property is sold subject to a contractual license, equity imposes a constructive trust on the purchaser.
The stipulation for C to take the property subject to D's rights, even though D was not a party to the contract of sale, was valid and enforceable (similar to Beswick v Beswick).