R v Ivor [2021] EWCA Crim 1821

Court of Appeal

Facts: The complainant (C) was in a relationship with a violent drug dealer who exerted significant pressure on her. Although she outwardly appeared to consent to sexual activity, the reality was that her consent was obtained under coercive circumstances. The case examined whether the complainant's apparent consent could mask underlying coercion.

Held: The Court of Appeal upheld the conviction, finding that the jury properly assessed the complainant’s mental state and the genuineness of her consent. The evidence demonstrated that, despite the outward appearance of consent, the complainant was subjected to coercion and duress, affecting the validity of her consent.

Key Quote: The Court emphasized that "the outward appearance of consent can mask underlying coercion or duress."

💡Leveluplaw: This case highlights the significant impact of coercion on the assessment of consent, emphasizing that apparent consent can be deceptive when coercion is present.