R v Bolton [1992] 1 WLR 1404
Court: Court of Appeal (Criminal Division)
Facts: D agreed to a deceptive scheme that could not result in securing a valuable security.
Held: Conviction upheld. The court held that the impossibility of the scheme's success did not negate the conspiracy charge.
Key Judicial Statement: Lord Justice Balcombe stated, "Even if the scheme could not succeed, the agreement to engage in the scheme was sufficient for a conspiracy conviction."