Regal (Hastings) v Gulliver [1967] 2 AC 134

Court: House of Lords

Facts: Directors acquired shares in a subsidiary company when the holding company could not afford them. They later made a profit on the sale of both the holding and subsidiary companies.

Held: The directors were liable to account for the profit to the company for breaching their fiduciary duty.

Key Judicial Statement: Lord Russell suggested that the directors could have protected themselves through a resolution by the Regal shareholders, either before or after the transaction.

💡Leveluplaw: Directors must account to the company for any profit made from opportunities that rightfully belonged to the company, ensuring they do not benefit personally from their fiduciary breaches.

Previous
Previous

Towers v African Tug Co [1904] 1 Ch 558

Next
Next

Cook v Deeks [1916] 1 AC 554